Polar Plots and Circular Statistics in ArcGIS

Direction can be difficult to analyze statistically because of its circular nature. The difference between 1 degree and 360 degrees is the same as the difference between 1 degree and 2 degrees, making it difficult to plug into a typical statistical model. There are issues we often face with directional data while describing and analyzing it. Currently in ArcGIS, there is no robust tool available for directionality. Jeff Jenness, an independent GIS consultant specializing in developing analytical applications for a wide variety of topics, has created a set of tools called Polar Plots and Circular Statistics. This a very helpful tool which could be used for different purposes. This tool is installed as an extension in ArcMap, but it is a type of extension that is automatically loaded. You will not see this extension in the “Extensions” dialog available in the ArcGIS “Tools” menu. It is not dependent on any other extensions or any ArcGIS license level. This extension does not include a separate toolbar so you will need to manually put the tools in an existing toolbar.

Check it out !! Polar Plots for ArcGIS

Polar_Plots_Maual_A4

 

Polar

Sustainable Land Imaging Users Forum meeting on Dec. 4th

On December 4, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and NASA will host an event in which leadership from both agencies will provide details about how user needs will be assessed to help inform NASA’s Sustainable Land Imaging Program. User requirements are a critical source of information used as input to help inform the design and implementation of future spaceborne systems intended to provide global, continuous Landsat-quality visible to shortwave infrared and thermal infrared measurements for at least the next 25 years. The USGS has been developing a structured methodology for acquiring, cataloging, maintaining and evaluating user requirements for Earth observations through its Land Remote Sensing Program, which manages the USGS contributions to the joint efforts of USGS and NASA for the Landsat program. The Users Forum will feature the methodologies and approaches the USGS is utilizing to acquire and evaluate user requirements and will present some findings and evaluations that can be applied to design considerations for the development of the future architecture. The forum will include presentation of methods and preliminary findings, and will offer opportunities for feedback with regard to the approach and requirements gathered to date. The requirements component will be described in the context of our upcoming planning timeline and identify opportunities and processes for providing input into our planning. This is a notice of a meeting, not a solicitation of any kind.

For more info and registration, go to NASA Website

Source: NASA

Mapping a Mission to Mars: GIS Aids in Planning the Terrestrial Phase of Mars Science Laboratory Mission

Mission planners at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) hugged, hollered, and high-fived when the most sophisticated scientific instrument in the history of interplanetary exploration gently landed on the desert planet this past August. The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL), a compact car-sized rover designed to roam an ancient impact crater searching for clues to Mars’ dynamic history, marks the seventh successful landing of a NASA craft on the planet. Outfitted with state-of-the-art optics and sensors, MSL will collect and transmit data back to earth for two years or perhaps even longer.

Navigating through space en route to another planet’s surface was only half the battle for MSL engineers. To interact with Mars, Curiosity, the six-wheeled vehicle that transports the laboratory to predetermined locations to conduct various experiments, must contend with the Martian terrain itself. Strewn with jagged rocks and boulders, Mars presents innumerable physical hazards that can hobble—or bring to a screeching halt—any mission not meticulously modeled and planned. For this reason, NASA and JPL choose to map their missions using geospatial tools to perform modeling and analysis. MSL mission planners used a combination of ArcGIS and remote-sensing imagery collected in prior Mars missions to achieve the best possible awareness of Mars’ diverse terrain and complicated geography.

Final four Mars Science Laboratory landing ellipses on THEMIS daytime thermal image mosaic overlaid on MOLA topographic maps.Final four Mars Science Laboratory landing ellipses on THEMIS daytime thermal image mosaic overlaid on MOLA topographic maps: (a) Eberswalde, (b) Gale, (c) Holden, and (d) Mawrth. Ellipses are 25 by 20 km and oriented east–west for the 2011 rover Opportunity. The rover Curiosity landed in Gale Crater (map b above) on August 5, 2012.

Reconnaissance Imagery

Imagery resources are crucial to construct maps for any terrestrial exploration of a planet, moon, or asteroid. Imagery datasets for MSL mission planning came from three active remote-sensing satellites that have been orbiting Mars for years collecting visible and multispectral photographic data of the Martian surface for their respective assignments. Of those three satellites, the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter was the last to reach the planet, in 2006, and hence contains the most advanced optics and richest imagery datasets. Called the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE), it provided the foundational basemap imaging that NASA and JPL needed to construct maps for future rover-based missions.

JPL imported or created hundreds of datasets derived from HiRISE surveys into ArcGIS so that models could be run to process potential landing sites. From that imagery, 30 possible landing locations were considered. Variables important to landing feasibility are geographic in nature, and geospatial analysis helped the mission team narrow down the list of possible landing locations. Geography-related factors included latitude for thermal management of the lab, elevation for sufficient atmosphere to slow the spacecraft, relief for control and fuel management during descent, and slope for rover stability at touchdown. Gale Crater was finally chosen as the study area because it best met the required science and safety requirements of the expedition.

One-meter slope map (a) and corresponding HiRISE image (b) showing traversable paths (in purple) through high science priority clay and sulfate deposits south of the Gale Crater ellipse.One-meter slope map (a) and corresponding HiRISE image (b) showing traversable paths (in purple) through high science priority clay and sulfate deposits south of the Gale Crater ellipse. Choke points where the traverse path must go through a narrow canyon are shown as dots.

Scientific Significance

Channels and canyons on Mars indicate evidence of large amounts of moving liquid water in the planet’s distant past. As such, MSL’s primary assignment is to provide a more detailed understanding of Mars’ chronology, geophysical processes, and life-harboring potential. MSL needed to land in a geologically rich area, but that also required relatively flat terrain nearby so that the rover can land safely and navigate with the least number of obstacles. Small-scale HiRISE imagery with derived rock density and abundance mapped within ArcGIS were essential in determining which sites were safe for landing, as well as traversable, to conduct its scientific experiments.

MSL mission planners created GIS projects for each site candidate to manage and quantify tens of gigabytes of geospatial information, such as digital elevation models (DEMs) and rock abundance maps from HiRISE. Processing the images and DEMs in ArcGIS helped the team establish the best horizontal and vertical geodetic control possible for entry, descent, and landing of MSL. The resultant maps covered roughly 85 percent of the landing ellipses—a percentage more than sufficient to support locational awareness during the entire mission.

Future

GIS will serve as a tactical and strategic planning tool during MSL’s traverse operations, as well as serve as a pivotal dataset for creating and evaluating new science throughout the mission.

For more information, contact Fred J. Calef III, PhD, scientific applications software engineer II, Jet Propulsion Laboratory (e-mail: fcalef@jpl.nasa.gov, tel.: 818-393-1548).

 

Source: ESRI